<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Running the Gauntlett - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-4d858e04" type="application/json"/><link>http://running-the-gauntlett.disqus.com/</link><description>Financial insights, market commentary, and general musings of the world!</description><atom:link href="http://running-the-gauntlett.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:28:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: India&amp;#8217;s new tax code?</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/08/indias-new-tax-code/#comment-158913685</link><description>One important feature of various tax related announcements made by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in the Union Budget for 2011-12 was that new moves will ultimately converge with the new Direct Tax Code (DTC) to be implemented from April 1, 2012.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sell ipod touch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some See China’s Buying Spree on Commodities as Short-Lived - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/some-see-china%e2%80%99s-buying-spree-on-commodities-as-short-lived-nytimescom/#comment-155753439</link><description>I just could not depart your site prior to suggesting that I actually enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is going to be back often in order to check up on new posts</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alannah</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some See China’s Buying Spree on Commodities as Short-Lived - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/some-see-china%e2%80%99s-buying-spree-on-commodities-as-short-lived-nytimescom/#comment-155250276</link><description>Most commodity prices have benefited from the "buying spree" by investors and funds and as I indicated in the Overview, that situation may be overdone. Watch from the sidelines for now. The "fat lady is clearing her throat". The recent price gains in ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">montessori gold coast</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some See China’s Buying Spree on Commodities as Short-Lived - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/some-see-china%e2%80%99s-buying-spree-on-commodities-as-short-lived-nytimescom/#comment-154534235</link><description>Additionally, winter weather and the unfolding situation in Egypt are adding near-term support to commodity prices. TER: China is making some significant attempts to put the brakes on its overheated economy. Are you concerned that these moves will ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watch mars needs moms online</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:23:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some See China’s Buying Spree on Commodities as Short-Lived - NYTimes.com</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/some-see-china%e2%80%99s-buying-spree-on-commodities-as-short-lived-nytimescom/#comment-147046555</link><description>He is described by Mark as a "computer genius; teacher; vagabond anarchist who ran naked through the Parthenon." Collins dreams of opening a restaurant in ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pills to get pregnant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goldman Sachs &amp;#8212; One ring to rule them all</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-one-ring-to-rule-them-all/#comment-31567038</link><description>haeh heh! excellent. too late though! and it is a canard to pretend the republicans are deeply concerned. the rot is bipartisan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kerz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:46:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: India&amp;#8217;s new tax code?</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/08/indias-new-tax-code/#comment-31565040</link><description>Like your comment. 2 sources of income: taxes and "quant easing" HA HA. so true.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Imagine, a 3rd world country is liberalizing, while US having killed it's workforce now needs to raise taxes. imagine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kerz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: India&amp;#8217;s new tax code?</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/08/indias-new-tax-code/#comment-27097822</link><description>Its really cool, I came to know this really worth visiting, just bookmarked your site.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gisnap.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gisnap.com/&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;The place where fun never ends</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gisnap</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socialized Heathcare&amp;#8230; Do we want this?</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/07/socialized-heathcare-do-we-want-this/#comment-13233938</link><description>the plan is not a Canadian system, it is to create competition by offering another plan (without profit motives) for people to consider. they would have the option to keep current HI plan or the govt one. the expectation is that it will drives proces down (good thing. competition does this). how it is funded to kick off, will it drive prices down, will most of the 47million be insured are all great questions. do not by the myth that this is socialized medicine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">surferdude123</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socialized Heathcare&amp;#8230; Do we want this?</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/07/socialized-heathcare-do-we-want-this/#comment-13212538</link><description>The Canadian system does have an inherent "rationing" to it -- the legislature ultimately gets to decide what level of care will be provided to citizens.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I like the UK model -- the state guarantees a certain standard of care that works for most people in most cases.  Unlike in Canada where all doctors must work for the state health care system and where a doctor can not be in private practice, in the UK there are private doctors and private insurance.  So you can buy supplementary insurance to get a higher standard of care than what the UK state insurance provides.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;In fact we already have this system in the USA -- if you're over 65, that is.  Medicare provides a certain standard of care as determined by the legislature (in conjunction with doctors, etc.) and if you want "more" or "better" care (e.g. a private room at the hospital instead of a shared room) you can buy supplemental insurance or pay out of pocket to cover that extra level of care.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;What Medicare and any state-run health plan for people of all ages in the USA could benefit from is a realignment of incentives.  Right now doctors who serve Medicare patients are incentivized to do more -- more tests, more procedures, etc. -- since they get paid based upon volume and not on results.  Any state run health care should change that incentive to encourage doctors to provide the best results for a patient, not the highest volume of care.  A few private hospitals have begun doing this (Mayo Clinic for example) and some HMO's who own the whole system (hospitals, doctors on payroll, etc.) like Kaiser Permanente do this.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;In the UK, general practice doctors get incentives to get their patients to stop smoking, lower their blood pressure and cholesterol, etc., resulting in a healthier population that is cheaper to care for.  Here in the USA we often just eat our burgers, get obese, get diabetes, and then go on a lifetime of drugs and insulin, for example, rather than stopping the problem at the root cause.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;As a small business owner, I'm all for an affordable health care system that my employees could use.  Right now it is very hard and expensive to compete with large companies in terms of the benefits that I can offer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Airlines</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/airlines/#comment-10813900</link><description>I'd like teleporters!  I bet we will see more consolidations in the airline industry.  Protectionism will make it difficult for foreign carries to carry domestic routes, but would make sense.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Once fuel prices skyrocket air travel will become very expensive and will no longer be a means of travel for all.  That is a ways off however, so the US ought to start investing in a rail system ASAP!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gauntlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Airlines</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/06/airlines/#comment-10813173</link><description>"What will the travel industry look like in the coming years?"
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;High speed rail?
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Maybe teleporters..?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns and Ammo</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/03/guns-and-ammo/#comment-6971931</link><description>Yes, this is true.  However, I find it unfortunate that in the land of the free we must resort to black markets.  Though this is nothing new, and I imagine once prices on foodstuffs have price floors then we will see serious black markets.  until then...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gauntlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns and Ammo</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/03/guns-and-ammo/#comment-6971800</link><description>There will always be a black market for guns and ammo for those who don't want to be tracked.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Publicus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Updates for 2009-02-05</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/02/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-05/#comment-6271746</link><description>great article.visited your site for first time today,but i must say your write is of top notch and i will surely frequent your site.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">can collection agency sue?</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Airline in Crisis&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/01/airline-in-crisis/#comment-5866844</link><description>Just curb check your luggage.  Well worth the $2/bag extra fee to have someone handle the bags for you, since you're already paying $15 - $100 per bag.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Updates for 2009-01-09</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2009/01/twitter-updates-for-2009-01-09/#comment-5228034</link><description>We've started to see some great things happening with twitter, hope to see you on there, we're pennypicks and post often about the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">penny stocks</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: All Calm on the Western Front</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/12/all-calm-on-the-western-front/#comment-4832272</link><description>"Just remember with every crisis there is opportunity."
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I took advantage of some great after-Christmas sales and I'm going to refinance my house again at 5% for 30 years fixed and get my share of the bailout!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward the incompetent&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/reward-the-incompetent/#comment-3937748</link><description>I didn't even qualify for a bail-out check.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:20:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward the incompetent&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/reward-the-incompetent/#comment-3900254</link><description>Oh right... !  I still have yet to receive my bailout check.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gauntlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retirees are a threat to the markets</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/retirees-are-a-threat-to-the-markets/#comment-3900231</link><description>lol... well perhaps something like that.  I wouldn't call it a Pyramid Scheme per say...  however, with all bubbles there is a herd mentality.  The best point to get in is after the capitulation when everyone wants out.  We have yet to hit that point.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The worst time to get in is when people are in a panic to buy because they don't want to miss the boat, and the same for the downside.  In Oct. 2007 and December 1999 we had people thinking that stocks were the best bet that they could only go higher... we know the story.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Smart money gets in when dumb money is getting out and vice-versa.  So, I'd call it more of human psychology than a Pyramid Scheme, but in a sense they are similar in nature.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gauntlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward the incompetent&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/reward-the-incompetent/#comment-3900109</link><description>But selective socialism is great, as long as it benefits me. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retirees are a threat to the markets</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/retirees-are-a-threat-to-the-markets/#comment-3900090</link><description>Stock Market = Pyramid Scheme?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The case for inflation</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/the-case-for-inflation/#comment-3895166</link><description>Well-written article, but Obama is not a Boomer.  Hopefully you are open to allowing your readers to see an alternative view in comments on this blog: Obama’s membership in Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X).  I’ve seen numerous very credible experts say recently that Obama is part of GenJones; if Obama’s generational identity is of interest to you, click this link…it goes to a page filled with lots of articles and videos of many famous people discussing Obama’s identity as a GenJoneser, and the many implications of this for his Presidency: &lt;a href="http://www.generationjones.com/2008election.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.generationjones.com...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeopleWatching</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward the incompetent&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.trevorgauntlett.com/2008/11/reward-the-incompetent/#comment-3884840</link><description>#2 doesn't set a precedent and continue our march toward destroying any remaining semblance of a free-market economy that our country was founded upon.  If those who took on too much risk are being bailed out at our expense to buoy the economy then help out every homeowner including you and me.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;This is selective socialism.  Think of all the people who just missed the deadline and already foreclosed or walked away.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Do I want my property to half in value... no.  However, they are throwing buckets of water on a forest fire.  Jobs are being lost, the recession is deepening.  The people being bailed out have a small disposable income.  Even if they have smaller payments what happens if they lose their jobs?  They will still go into default.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Either way housing prices are going to continue to decline.  Any look at the Case Schiller index shows how overvalued housing prices have become.  Anytime prices (of anything) go to high they eventually correct.  Given that this is the largest credit expansion in modern history we are now embarking upon the largest credit contraction in modern history.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;However, the Fed will NOT allow a depression to occur.  Eventually once all this free money starts circulating we will have massive inflation which will push prices much higher.  Inflation through cheap credit is what got us into this mess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gauntlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
